Northeastern University just posted a record-low acceptance rate of 5.2 percent for its incoming class, the Globe reports. Not bad for a former commuter school. The university’s administrators, professors, alumni and students obviously love the rating for the elite status it suggests. But is this newfound status really good for society? Is it good for Boston? People tend to forget that the former commuter school was intended to be, well, a part-time commuter school when it was first launched by the YMCA of Boston in the late 1800s to prepare young men (and later women) for the workplace. And by young men, we’re not talking Harvard men. We’re talking those who, for instance, were more interested in attending the new automobile school and other practical programs at the then “Evening Institute for Young Men.” The institute soon after added schools for law and finance etc. Its famous “co-op” program started in 1909 – and it’s been a career-starter hit ever since.
In effect, the early Northeastern, which became a college in 1916, was a sort of cross between a vocational school, night school and community college. It was specifically aimed at providing educations to Boston’s working-class residents. Now? It’s a completely transformed school, something the Globe’s Hillary Burns rightly addresses: “Some worry about the people Northeastern’s exclusivity leaves behind, including the scores of students from working-class families in the Boston area who once flocked to the school. They often lacked the stellar academics you need to gain admission today …”
Northeastern isn’t the only local college that has gone through a similar transformation. Beginning in the late 20th Century, Tufts University, Boston College and Boston University – under the remarkable leadership of Jean Mayer, the J. Donald Monan and John Silber, respectively – also began to transform from relatively sleepy schools, with a large number of commuter students, into what we now consider top-tier universities. They too left behind thousands (not scores) of working-class families.
The same approximate trend is happening today at the high school level in Massachusetts, as vocational high-schools slowly evolve from their traditional working-class roots into something more appealing to the middle-class and the upper-middle class. They’re becoming more exclusive. They too are leaving behind many lower-income families.
To be clear, I think it’s great that schools like Northeastern, Tufts, BC and BU have striven to become better universities. And as experts note, they needed to evolve to survive changing demographic trends. Boston College, for instance, was on the verge of bankruptcy when Monan (and later William P. Leahy) embarked on transforming BC from a “regional to a national and ultimately an international university.”
But let’s face it: the transformations of Northeastern and other universities were also about ego and status, the old “lust to shine or rule,” for college presidents, faculty and alumni to be able to brag they’re among the elite. Remember: status is also about survival, of the instinct variety, and humans crave it.
Bottom line: Northeastern’s newfound status deserves to be cheered. But not too heartily. Many have indeed been left behind by its transformation.