Those awful AP reporters had it coming. … And from here on in we shall refer to ‘New Mexico’ as ‘New America.’ …
-
Is Kraft’s housing plan good politics?
The BBJ reports that mayoral candidate Josh Kraft is providing more details about his housing plan that he first proposed last week. Housing is obviously a hot-button issue these days, no doubt. But are voters really going to think he can make a difference on the issue as mayor? Or are they going to think he’s merely the front man for real estate developers? … I don’t know. Cutting down on the affordability mandate is sound economics, but I’m not so sure it’s sound politics. … He needs a little more shameless populist punch than this, I suspect, though not of the populist variety mentioned directly below.
Update – 2.13.25 — From GBH: “Wu: Kraft is pitching ‘fake rent control.’”
-
‘The Populist Cure Is Worse Than the Elite Disease’
I liked the headline. Not so much the column. … Speaking of pieces in the Times: “Trump’s Actions Have Created a Constitutional Crisis, Scholars Say.” My immediate reaction: No shit. … My other reaction to the timing of the piece: What took so long ?
-
About Tom Brady’s $740K watch …
No. 12’s performance as a Fox analyst during the Super Bowl is getting panned at the Globe and Times and elsewhere. … And so is the ‘grotesque’ $740,000 watch that he wore during the game. … Flashback: ‘Where did you get that dress? It’s awful!”
Re Tom’s booth performance: forget Tony Romo and other on-air NFL analysts. The ultimate player-turned-commentator he should strive to emulate: John McEnroe. No cliches. No platitudes. Just telling it like it is, as seen through the eyes of a great ex-player.
-
Mass General Brigham to cut jobs amid $250M shortfall
And this is the largest and allegedly strongest health-care provider in the state? Not good. … Here’s the BBJ’s story. No specific staff-cut numbers yet (or none I can see). But the Globe reports it’s going to be in the hundreds over two years, for the largest layoff rounds in MGB’s history.
-
WSJ: ‘Mr. Trump clearly wants to intimidate the press’
Sorry for my onesidedism of late. I’m trying hard to resist TDS. … Anyway, the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board continues to pleasantly surprise. Re President Trump’s frivolous lawsuit against CBS and the FCC’s launch of an official inquiry: “Mr. Trump clearly wants to intimidate the press, and it’s no credit to the FCC to see it reinforcing that with an inquiry.”
Dan Kennedy and Jill Abramson at the Globe have more on Trump’s aggressive harassment campaigns against the media.
-
Trump tests constitutional boundaries again by shutting down CFPB
The Trump administration is once again effectively shutting down an agency without proper Congressional approval. … Ho hum. Another weakening of the constitution. No big deal. … Elizabeth Warren is vowing to stop the closure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that she originally helped create. … Next up on OBM’s hit list: The U.S. Postal Service? Department of Education? Department of Energy?
-
For many Republicans, the end justifies the means, Part II
Jack Butler at the National Review makes clear President Trump’s assault on the federal government isn’t really about efficiencies or DEI or transgender issues per se. It’s really about the long-cherished conservative goal of philosophically defeating the left and slashing the size of government in general, notes Butler, who harks back 70 years to William F. Buckley Jr.’s stated founding principles for NR. … Butler makes no mention of the way Trump’s cuts are being implemented today, so it’s fair to say he thinks the end goal of smaller government and defeating the left justifies Trump’s trampling of norms and constitutional niceties. … Ditto for Federalist founder Sean Davis, who’s practically in ecstasy over Trump’s budget-cutting chaos, and for the NYT Post’s Michael Goodman, who agrees this is all about the “administrative state,” etc. etc. …Again, no objections are raised as to how all of these cuts are being achieved.
Note to media: Trump and Musk are, yes, going after DEI and trans-gender issues. But many on the right are going after much, much more. That’s the big-picture story. … The WSJ gets it: “DOGE’s First Round of Cuts Went to Trump Priorities, but Bigger Targets Await.” …
-
Here we go: NIH cuts
This is going to be huge in Boston medical-research circles. … Via STAT News or the Globe. Take your pick.
Update – 2.9.25 – Carl Bergstrom breaks down the NIH cuts, saying they’re straight out of Project 2025 and more devastating than thought. … Via UH. … Another physician who I talked to agrees . “This is bad news,” he told me. “They’re implementing their Project 2025.”
Update II – 2.10.25 – From WBUR: “Judge halts Trump administration’s cap on NIH funds after Mass. and 21 other states sue.”
-
The Atlantic: Is it succumbing to Trump Derangement Syndrome?
One of the reasons why I subscribe to The Atlantic is because it’s been a political breath of fresh air in recent years, providing an often eclectic mix of stories unafraid to bash the bogus assumptions of both the left and right. … But I’m beginning to wonder if The Atlantic is coming down with a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Its latest Hitler analogy story is not quite the final straw. But it and other anti-Trump pieces of late have been a little too crude, too heavy-handed, too predictable for my tastes. There’s too many of them. …Maybe it’s somehow tied to the The Atlantic’s recent hiring of more staffers to cover Trump II. …
Btw — I’m not advocating a form of bothsidesism here. I don’t like ping-pong, false-balance journalism. But the only thing worse than bothsidesism is onesidedism. The outrageous actions of Trump in recent weeks demand tough, principled, comprehensive coverage. Yet it still needs to be perceptive, original and convincing coverage, not run-of-the-mill, semi-hysterical onesidedism that didn’t work in Trump’s first term and won’t work in his second.
Btw II –- I used my own Hitler analogy the other week. So I guess I’m guilty of some hypocrisy here. But the Atlantic has recently engaged a little too often in Hitler analogies, usually a sign of onesidedism at work.
