
.
The Massachusetts House earlier this week passed a $61 billion state budget that almost no one believes comes anywhere close to reflecting future reality. Senate President Karen Spilka is already saying that whatever fiscal 2026 budget is ultimately approved by lawmakers might have to be revised later in the year, depending on potential federal funding cuts, as MassterList reports. I’ll go further and say future revisions ‘will,’ not ‘might,’ happen later in the year, based on these Hill and WSJ stories about President Trump’s “wish list” budget that calls for $163 billion in non-defense discretionary spending cuts. Some GOP budget hawks are already saying the proposed cuts, unveiled this morning, don’t go far enough. … Trump has said entitlements such as Medicaid and Social Security won’t be cut. But you just know some Republican lawmakers will insist on Medicaid cuts, particularly funds having anything to do with Obama Care. … Here’s one of many known unknowns to think about: How will red-state GOP governors react to proposed cuts to Medicaid, education and transportation funds flowing from D.C to states? Blue-state Massachusetts’s finances may well depend on how Republicans like Kelly Ayotte respond behind the scenes to budget battles in Washington.
Back to state finances, most everyone knows the House’s just-passed budget is a sort of make-believe budget, something floating in suspended animation, based on known unknowns, if you will. What other choice did lawmakers have? Pretend they know what Donald Trump et gang might do months from now?


