As we head into the Memorial Day weekend, the WSJ’s Peggy Noonan lists ‘The Best Years of Our Lives’ as her all-time favorite war movie – and I can’t say I disagree. It’s one of the best movies ever made, let alone one of the all-time best war movies. And it’s not even set during war time. It’s about the after-effects of war. … Speaking of war movies set after wars, The Third Man and Judgment at Nuremberg are definitely on my list of favorite war movies. … My all-time favorite war movie? It’s probably Lawrence of Arabia, though my sentiments are constantly changing, depending on how many times I’ve seen a movie on TCM and grown tired of it. Zulu used to be my favorite war movie, but I’ve seen it too often. Ditto Saving Private Ryan and Casablanca (though I still enjoy all three films, of course). … Two excellent films with similar anti-war themes: Paths of Glory and Breaker Morant. I’m surprised the latter isn’t on Rotten Tomatoes’ 100 Best War Movies of All Time. Including Captain America: The First Avenger on the list and not Breaker Morant? What a travesty. …
NBC10 Boston’s Ryan Kath has an excellent piece on how landlords are sometimes the victim of abusive tenants, not the other way around. But before you roll your eyes, check out the story. It really is outrageous how “professional tenants,” i.e. scammers, use eviction and bankruptcy laws to scam their way out of paying rent – and collect state housing assistance at the same time. They largely prey on mom-and-pop landlords who can barely make ends meet with two mortgages to pay, as Kath notes. …
I wasn’t going to write about Harvard this week. What more could I add to the latest outrageous Trump administration assault on the university? Then I saw this NYT opinion piece by Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at Harvard, and I couldn’t resist. The reason: Pinker, as he notes in his piece, is a long-time critic of Harvard’s past ugly bouts with campus political correctness/woke-ism, etc., etc. After establishing his bonafides as a centrist critic of the university, Pinker rightly unloads on the ‘unhinged’ Trump administration’s attacks on Harvard. … I could also explain in detail how the administration’s treatment of Harvard is a classic example of the Trump 10/90 Rule. But I won’t. I’ll merely point it out.
Update –– This is encouraging, via the Globe: “Judge halts Trump ban on foreign students at Harvard.”
The BBJ has the details on the tech giant’s purchase of Sublime Systems’ low-carbon cement product that it expects to make at a future factory in Holyoke. … How much is 622,000 metric tons of cement? Enough to build 25 to 35 full-scale NFL stadiums, the BBJ reports.
Update — Banker & Tradesman’s James Sanna has more on the ‘megaton’ factory that Sublime Systems, an MIT spinoff, is building in Holyoke.
The political kerfuffle of the week is quickly fading away, as modern political kerfuffles usually do, and so maybe it’s time to point out the obvious regarding the Biden Cover-up frenzy that’s now mercifully easing: Democrats, bad, very bad, for covering up Joe Biden’s mental state while at same time hypocritically questioning Donald Trump’s mental state. Just as it’s bad, very bad, for Republicans to remain silent about Trump’s mental state while at the same time hypocritically questioning what Dems knew about Biden’s mental state. … The Globe’s Jeff Jacoby tackled the issue of partisan hackery and hypocrisy back in January. And Bill Maher was attacking political hypocrisy in general the other night. …
Do you think Gov. Maura Healey on Monday knew what was coming the following day? As you may vaguely recall (or not), the governor earlier this week announced plans to quicken the pace of closing hotel shelters for the homeless and newly arrived immigrants. The next day, state Auditor Diana DiZoglio slammed the Healey administration for approving ‘unlawful’ no-bid contracts for the controversial shelter program. … So to answer the opening question: Yeah, Healey knew what was coming. The Herald’s Joe Battenfeld agrees, saying DiZoglio’s harsh criticism could be a preview of a Healey-DiZoglio clash for governor. I don’t know about that. As I’ve previously noted, the time’s not right for DiZoglio, who’s young and can afford to wait.
As for the shelter program, Healey has known for a while that it’s a complete boondoggle, costing the state a billion dollars a year before she and other state leaders finally imposed some common-sense restraints on an out-of-control program that threatened the state’s fiscal health, not to mention threatened certain Dems’ political futures. Healey, who’s running for re-election, didn’t need Diana DiZoglio’s prodding to act. Next year’s gubernatorial election is motivation enough. The shelter program, as it stood before recent changes, was bad government and therefore bad politics. …
Next question: Did Healey act in time to distance herself from the shelter fiasco? I think so. I don’t hear a lot of people talking about it these days. But a competently produced GOP attack ad, run over and over again on the tube and elsewhere next year, could change all that.
Update — 5.23.25 – Spoke too soon. GOP gubernatorial candidate Michael Kenneealy isn’t waiting till next year to go after Healey on the issue — and the Healey team is hitting back, the Herald reports. Howie Carr is taking time off from the Karen Read trial to pile on.
Update II – 5.23.25 – And from MassterList: “The shelter headache that won’t cease.”
Boston’s office market continues to limp along, showing signs of recovery one day, signs of regression the next, etc. But at least we’re not Portland, Oregon, where some office tenants are of the distinctly non-paying variety. From the WSJ’s brutal takedown of the Portland market:
“After Digital Trends moved out of the U.S. Bancorp Tower in Portland, Ore., the technology publisher didn’t hold back about why it left.
“The property, once a premier address in the city, was afflicted with ‘vagrants sleeping in hallways of vacant office floors.’ They were ‘starting fires in stairwells, smoking fentanyl and defecating in common areas,’ according to papers the company filed in a lease-termination lawsuit.”
Some historians in central and western Massachusetts think we’ve gotten it wrong for 250 long years. The American Revolution didn’t start in Lexington and Concord in 1775. It actually started a year earlier, when thousands of colonists stormed courthouses in western and central Massachusetts in open rebellion to Britain’s takeover of the state’s judicial system, they say. GBH’s Sam Turken has more. … It’s actually quite interesting history. I hadn’t known about the courthouse rebellions until reading Turken’s piece. … I guess I’ve long suffered from a bad case of eastern-Massachusetts bias. …
Btw, it seems they’ve been trying to set the record straight for a while now about where and when the Revolution really started.
At one point last decade, I sort of assumed Boston Scientific had become a perennial loser, one of those has-been companies whose best days were permanently behind it, sort of like Digital Equipment, Wang Laboratories, GE etc., etc. But guess what? Boston Scientific is back. And it’s now Massachusetts’ most valuable public company, helped by a 19 percent stock price gain since the start of the year and a corresponding loss of 21 percent by reigning local king Thermo Fisher, as the BBJ reports. … Take a gander at BS’s stock performance since 2000, starting the new century at a low of $6.44 a share, then experiencing a brief bump around 2004 before collapsing again to $5.14 in 2012. But it’s been a mostly steady-eddie climb since then. Impressive. … BSX stock chart via Yahoo Finance.
Update – Here’s a look at BS’s revenue numbers since the mid-1990s. Notice the 2008-2013 revenue slump, followed by a subsequent rise fueled most recently by a major acquisition spree. They threw money at the growth problem — and some of it stuck.
Update II — 5.22.25 – And some things never change. From the BBJ: “Boston Scientific CEO buys Palm Beach County mansion for $17 million.”
Ray Flynn and family, election-night victory party, 1983.
As promised, here’s the last of Brighton Reader’s thoughts on former Mayor Ray Flynn, who BR argues wasn’t the father of modern Boston progressivism as recently portrayed in this Globe op-ed and later discussed by Hub Blog here and here. Simply put, Flynn was more complicated than any single label. He was part liberal, part populist, part deeply conservative Catholic, as Brighton Reader remembers him. From BR:
“During Ray Flynn’s first campaign for mayor in 1983, Peter Lucas labeled him the ‘Lech Walesa of Boston politics.’ He was sometimes called a populist, given his working class background, focus on neighborhoods, support for unions, and for rent control, too. He was out in the neighborhoods as a city councilor, and a publicity hound. Both traits continued as mayor, sometimes going into the ridiculous (grabbing a fire extinguisher from a Santa Claus!?). But Ray first made his mark as a state rep with relentless opposition to legal abortion. That issue gave him the attention that got him onto the Boston City Council and ultimately led to his the candidacy for mayor. …
“During Flynn’s first winter storm as mayor, he hopped in a plow alongside the driver, reporters from the then robust Boston media corps (tv stations! Newspapers! Radio stations!) went along for the ride. It was a hallmark of his mayoralty, the streets were plowed, the parks improved, street cleaning and resident parking expanded, abandoned cars were towed.
“There were two ‘factions’ in the Ray’s first term, those on the left were called ‘Sandinistas.’ The other didn’t have a name, as I remember, but were the South Boston/Dorchester people who had supported him for years, also the pro-life people from across the city. The Sandinistas were mainly activists, not from Boston, who supported him based on things like rent control and linkage, and had gotten to know him after he became a city councilor. Ray Dooley, Flynn’s campaign manager, seen as the leader of them, became head of a the Department of Administrative Services. At the time, this role made him the most important department head, overseeing the budget, with lots of influence on city policy. Having been campaign manager, he had a good relationship with Flynn, which gave him even more influence. He could get people hired throughout city government.
“Joe Fisher, Flynn’s trusted confidant, was the most influential of the other group. His desk was just outside of Flynn’s office. He was another person with lots of influence on policy, hiring, who got what. He didn’t oversee any department directly, he was a ‘special assistant’ to the mayor. He landed in jail for taking bribes.
“Btw – Ray Flynn and Billy Bulger were both from South Boston. They did not much care for each other.”
Hub Blog 