Maybe the Massachusetts Communities Act needs a little more time before it starts producing substantially more transit-oriented housing in Greater Boston. It’s been only four years since the act’s passage. Give it time. Be patient. It will eventually work, etc. etc. … And yet … yet it sure looks like it’s not working as planned and hoped – and even some of the act’s firmest YIMBY backers are starting to get discouraged by the act’s lack of results so far, as Commonwealth Beacon’s Jennifer Smith reports. The consensus among advocates at a recent YIMBY conference, as Smith writes, seemed to be that the state hasn’t been “muscular” enough in dealing with communities on housing, that the state has been too nice, that it’s time to “limit cities’ and towns’ ability to flout state mandates.” …
Hmmm. Can I, as a non-advocate, suggest something? How about trying the opposite? How about less stick, more carrots? How about state financial incentives and protections that address local concerns about added infrastructure costs and loss of historic character that accompany major new housing developments? How about the state paying to conduct town-by-town surveys to find out exactly what residents want (and don’t want) in terms of more housing? How about more emphasis on smaller-scale multifamily housing — such as duplexes and triple deckers, or even single-family homes on smaller lots — rather than pushing/allowing giant big-box apartment buildings that so many people despise? …
As the BBJ reports, something needs to be done. Greater Boston’s’ housing production is actually declining, not increasing, and we’re now dead last in some rankings when it comes to new housing starts. We need new approaches. Relying exclusively on brute force isn’t the answer.


