Am I the only one who feels caught between two extreme views on recent local immigration matters, i.e. Pam Bondi’s view and Michelle Wu’s view? The former is easy to condemn. Threatening to withhold federal dollars to Boston and/or the state if officials don’t comply with their ICE-cooperation order, a form of collective punishment one normally associates with a totalitarian mindset, not a democratic one? Message to Pam: Not everyone here agrees 100 percent with Michelle Wu. …
As for the latter Wu view, it’s harder to condemn, if only at this moment, when the right is behaving so obnoxiously. Standing up to authoritarian Trump bullying is a worthy cause, so give Wu some credit for telling Bondi where to go. But the entire sanctuary-city mindset – you know, the one that led to an open border that Biden refused to close but Trump just did, or the reckless spending of billions of state taxpayer dollars on an insane hotel shelter program – has never been my cup of tea. The left’s past extremes are partly why we’re now caught between two extremes.
Update – 8.23.25 — From the Herald’s Joe Battenfeld: “Will Bostonians be holding the bag for Michelle Wu’s grandstanding?” … I get where Joe is coming from. Wu’s grandstanding is definitely grating. But who’s the one threatening to withhold funds over this issue? It’s the Trump administration, not the Wu administration.

