In an editorial, the Globe isn’t quite blaming progressives for all the cost overruns and decades-long delays tied to the new Fall River-New Bedford rail line. But it is putting the onus on progressives to take the lead in reforming the state’s thicket of public-building regulations and laws that often lead to ridiculously high costs and unacceptable delays associated with so many major infrastructure projects in Massachusetts. From the Globe:
The inability of government to deliver projects on reasonable time frames, and at reasonable costs, ought to be viewed as a serious problem — especially for progressives who espouse faith in the power of government to solve problems.
And the Globe ends its editorial with this parting shot:
If progressives want voters to place their trust in government to solve big problems, they should be the ones leading the charge to dismantle the obstacles to a more effective government.
I’m not sure what exactly triggered this outburst, other than the fact that it took more than 30 years and a lot of wasted dough to finish the South Coast Rail project. But it’s a most welcome outburst.
Update – 3.26.25 – From a reader: “I didn’t read the Globe editorial but it almost certainly draws influence from the Abundance push. Haven’t read that either yet but there’s a 4 minute video excerpt with Bari Weiss here. Ruy Texeira did usual great job identifying what is right with the message, and why it is likely to hit the rocks.
“‘Abundance’ reminds me of 1988 and 1992 (eventually the Dukakis ‘competence’message got across, with a much more attractive candidate), with the exception that in 1988 and 1992 those pushing for change in how the Democratic Party approached American voters were much younger and less likely to be ‘abundant’ themselves. It is ironic that as Texeira indicates, many Democrats have become ‘abundant’ in the last four decades while pushing against abundance for all.”
HB Response – I suspect another influence is the brutal DOGE cuts at the federal level, a sort of cautionary warning to progressives about what might happen here if they don’t get their governmental act together.